Wednesday, 3 June 2015
Writings of Exile in the English Revolution and Restoration: Philip Major, Ashgate March 2013
Phillip Major’s new book is a welcome addition to research into areas of the English revolution that have been long neglected. Major’s book on exile joins a growing list including Geoffrey Smith’s look into Royalist exiles during the Civil Wars and the Commonwealth, and the same authors The Cavaliers in Exile 1640–1660.
Major’s research into royalist exile both internal and external has according to one writer “contributed much new and original research and written work on the subject exile.” Major’s work should be read alongside numerous other studies which in the last five years have filled a large number of gaps in royalist historiography. Whether this has changed our understanding of royalism remains to be seen. Any increase in our understanding must be allied to a study of the previous historiography from both left and right-wing historians.
Given the amount of material that remains to be archived and written about on the subject of exile Major’s book is a significant contribution to this research. The book is both austere in look and content. One problem is Major‘s use of nearly impenetrable language that would put even the most enthusiastic reader off. I understand that these type of books must have a certain academic standard, but there is a danger that this kind of language becomes available to a select few.
As the English writer George Orwell wrote “The inflated style itself is a kind of euphemism. A mass of Latin words falls upon the facts like soft snow, blurring the outline and covering up all the details. The great enemy of clear language is insincerity. When there is a gap between one's real and one's declared aims, one turns as it were instinctive to long words and exhausted idioms, like a cuttlefish spurting out ink. In our age, there is no such thing as "keeping out of politics." All issues are political issues, and politics itself is a mass of lies, evasions, folly, hatred, and schizophrenia. When the general atmosphere is bad, language must suffer. I should expect to find—this is a guess which I have not sufficient knowledge to verify—that the German, Russian and Italian languages have all deteriorated in the last ten or fifteen years, as a result of dictatorship.
The date range covered by Writings of Exile 1640-1680 is broad and challenging. This is probably why Gaby Mahlberg  felt that the book was a little “disjointed.” Although one writer defended this approach by saying “it challenges conventional paradigms which assume a precise demarcation of chronology, geography, and allegiance in this critical period of British and American history. Crossing disciplinary lines, it casts new light on how the ruptures -- and in some cases liberation -- of exile in these years both reflected and informed events in the public sphere” 
Major’s writing style is not for the faint-hearted. The academic tone and language that permeates the entire book is set in Chapter One Edward Hyde: Case Study of a Royalist Exile. Hyde was a significant figure both during the revolution and the restoration of the monarchy. His History of the Rebellion according to one writer “served to formulate and crystallize the social philosophy soon to be known as Toryism. As a classical rhetorician and portrait painter, there can be no doubt that Clarendon ranks among the greatest; the strength and resilience of the Tory view of history may be estimated from its present prevalence and influence”.
Hyde’s exile begun on Isles of Scilly, Jersey and other places during the 1640s and 50s. His second exile was in Montpellier in the late 1660s and 70s.
His fall from power would have had a profound psychological impact on him. However, major’s book does not really examine how politically Hyde dealt with what was tantamount to a political exile. I am not sure the best way to understand Hyde’s political exile is through his writings ‘Contemplation of the Psalms.
During his periods of exile, Hyde attempted to form a broad spectrum of political and religious alliances. While he would have experienced a great deal of personal, psychological and family problems due to exile, he did not go quietly into the good night.
In many instances, he sought to form a myriad of alliances to pursue his political and social agenda. As Mahlberg said looking into his ties with Republican and Leveller activists abroad would be an excellent research topic.
She goes on to say that “There are interesting links between Clarendon and his protégé Republican Henry Neville exiled to Italy in 1664 for their mutual benefit, for instance, while the firebrand Algernon Sidney made various overtures for office to the Restoration regime before plotting to topple it. Further leads worth exploring point to Catholic Rome, where both royalists and republicans had their own secret networks, and towards the Huguenot south of France, where in the later 1660s we find both the fallen first minister Hyde and the fallen Republican Sidney.”
While Major is within his right to study and research what he wants. One should not draw from this study of Clarendon's lesser religious writings a belief that these should be elevated above his political or literary books.
It is clear that many Royalist exiles sought to ransack the Bible to understand what had happened to them. For many Protestant Royalists “both the Established Church and its liturgy remained decidedly alive, if maimed and disoriented. Gathering in the private chapel of Sir Richard Browne, the royalist diplomat in Paris, and under the chaplaincy of John Cosin, dean of Peterborough, many Protestant royalists recast their newfound hardship in simple religious terms. Whether forced into exile by parliamentary ordinance or voluntarily following the Stuarts in hopes of restoration, those who attended services at Browne’s chapel turned to Scripture and divine example to comprehend defeat. 
In Chapter two on ‘Ceremony and Grief in the Royalist Exile’ Major continues his theme of royalist exiles seeking to maintain their religious practices into exile. The chapter explores royalists’ attitude ‘to the death of fellow refugees, as well as friends and family left behind in England.'
According to Major “there is considerable evidence, much of it again found in Evelyn’s Diary, for the continued observance by royalist exiles of the full panoply of Church of England services, including those of Holy Communion, christening, marriage and even the ordination of priests and consecration of bishops. Yet while, while each of these ceremonies played a major role in engendering a sense of cultural continuity amidst the rupture of exile, the rites of burial provide a particularly poignant and recurring motif in the extant contemporary literature. Exile is an extreme environment in which people experience an acute sense of change and behave in revealing ways”. 
Chapter 3 deals with ‘Royalist Internal Exile.' Major focuses on the exile of royalists from London and their internment in the countryside. These royalists built up a network of friends who shared political and religious beliefs.
The chapter is an elongated paper  which appeared in the Review of English Studies. It is pretty clear from Major’s work on the subject of internal exile that the topic has been heavily under-researched. Parliament during the civil war according to Major developed a large number of measures to ensure large scale royalist exile.
Again royalists refused to go quietly into internal exile. Many royalists responded by launching a barrage of poetry to understand their predicament. In (John) Berkenhead’s poem, ‘Staying in London’, Major states, “provides a window into the royalist literary response to banishment from London, and also allows us to explore its nuanced relationship with other cavalier verse of defeat and exile. Communicating hope and fear, secrecy and indecision, and the sometimes surprising level of enervation which these combinations can generate, it also incorporates more unambiguous royalist literary notions, such as imprisonment, though even these are by no means always treated in a similar way. Perhaps most singularly, the peculiar nature of exclusion from London during the English Revolution, with its concomitant anonymity and reduction in status, seems to turn the cavalier poet in on himself, to the brink of self-loathing, until, ironically, he eventually longs to leave the capitalç‘O tear me hence’çof his own volition. On this evidence, like their external equivalents, measures of internal exile such as the Act for Banishment have not only far-reaching physical, but also psychological, repercussions, not least for those who attempt to defy them”
Chapter four ‘William Goffe in New England’ discusses the regicides exile in America. As Gaby Mahlberg mentioned in her review three royalist chapters to one parliamentary is a little one sided. You get the feeling that if the other way around the author would be accused of extreme bias. Personally, I find this chapter the best. In the sense that Major writes in a manner that is easier to understand without dumbing down the history.
Goffe was a significant figure in the English Revolution and Major does give him the respect due. As Major points out there is an important difference between royalist and parliament exiles in so much that many of the political exiles were regicides and were hunted down without mercy. 
Like Hyde in chapter one Major tries to find similarities between Goffe’s and Hyde’s use of the Psalms and other Biblical texts in their exile writings. Like Hyde, earlier in the book, Goffe spent significant parts of his exile wondering how he lost power so quickly and very rapidly become exiled in a strange land. Major concentrates heavily on refugees turning to religious literature, but research can only take us so far. Republican revolutionaries like Goffe had no means of learning from past revolutionary struggles, so they turned to the Bible. Historians should not limit their research to a man’s religious proclivities.
Like a said earlier this book is not for the faint-hearted. The book is part of a broad shift in the historiography of the English Revolution. The last twenty or so years have seen a significant shift away from the dominant Marxist historiography. One of the byproducts of this change is over the previous five years we have witnessed a proliferation of Royalist studies. Major’s new book enters into this territory. Despite being well written and researched his use of language which is mostly impenetrable to the wider reading public could lead to this type of historiography being open to a select few.
 Politics and the English Language George Orwell, 1946 http://www.plainlanguage.gov/whatisPL/definitions/orwell.cfm
 A review of "Writings of Exile in the English Revolution and Restoration" by Philip Major
Author: D'Addario, Christopher Issue: Seventeenth-Century News: Vol. 72, Nos. 1 & 2;
 The Devotional Landscape of the Royalist Exile, 1649– 1660 Mark R. F. Williams
 Funerary Rites in the Royalist Exile: George Morley's Ministry in Antwerp, 1650-1653
Philip Major -http://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/renref/article/viewFile/9167/6131
 ‘Twixt Hope and Fear: John Berkenhead, Henry Lawes, And Banishment from London during the English Revolution
 See review- Killers of the King - The Men Who Dared to Execute Charles I Hardcover – 11 Sep 2014 352 pages Bloomsbury Publishing - ISBN-13: 978-1408851708ttp://keith-perspective.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/killers-of-king-men-who-dared-to_23.html