(This article by Tony Robson first appeared on the website wsws.org)
Post Office workers are to take national strike action May 3, in opposition to pay restraint imposed in line with the public sector policy dictated by the Johnson government.
The one-day stoppage will close 114 Crown Post Offices (those run directly by the Post Office) around the country and there will be no cash deliveries or collections from 11,500 sub-post offices. The action involves over 1,000 workers including counter staff as well as clerical, administration and call centre workers.
Royal Mail van, outside the Axminster post office (Image Credit: Wikipedia/Felix O)
Members
of the Communication Workers Union (CWU) voted in March by a 97.3 percent
majority for strike action in a ballot turnout of 70 percent. They have
rejected a miserly 2.5 percent pay rise, offered as inflation climbs to a
30-year high of 6 percent CPI and 9 percent RPI.
The
proposed two-year deal includes the pay freeze for last year and a lump sum of
£250 in addition to the 2.5 percent from April this year.The determination of
postal workers to fight back is in sharp contrast to the CWU. While the union
is making token noises about the insulting pay offer, its efforts have been
directed towards preventing a struggle from taking place.
Andy
Furey, CWU Assistant General Secretary, told the Independent, “Despite this
union’s best attempts to avoid strike action, the Post Office has displayed no
interest whatsoever in meaningful negotiations.”
The union
has confined itself to evasive references to a decent and fair agreement rather
than specify a demand in line with inflation and which compensates for last
year’s pay freeze.Now that a national strike is taking place the CWU is seeking
to head off a confrontation with the government and drive a wedge between
postal workers and millions of public sector workers suffering widespread
austerity.
In a
press release Furey states in reference to the Post Office, “They have told us
that they’re freezing pay in keeping with official government and public-sector
pay policy… But that’s an outrageous and dishonest excuse as the government’s
austerity measures do not apply to the Post Office and it should be borne in
mind that our members worked throughout the pandemic to provide essential
services to the Great British public.”
He added
that “the further irony here is that our members are always being told by
senior management that they are a commercial operation and required to make a
profit – yet the Post Office is a profitable concern – profits made by the hard
work and dedication and skill of our members.”
Health
workers, teachers, refuse workers and millions of other public sector workers
have served on the frontline of the pandemic in which their safety was disregarded
only to be rewarded with below inflation deals. The divisive approach of the
CWU must be rejected in favour of a unified fightback.
Furey
argues for accepting the entire framework of cost cutting and restructuring in
the name of profitability on the false pretence that workers will get their
“fair share” rather than suffer stepped-up exploitation.
The
state-owned Post Office was separated off from Royal Mail when the latter was
privatised back in 2012, splitting the cashier and retail operations from the
letter and parcel delivery service. Since then, the number of Crown Post
Offices has been reduced from 373 by more than two-thirds, to 114. Fully 99
percent of Post Offices are run by an independent postmaster, or what is
described as a larger franchise partner, i.e., major retail chains.
The
government subsidy has been reduced from £210 million in 2012-13 to £50 million
annually, according to a Financial Times article last August, “in the drive to
make the Post Office commercially viable.” Post Office CEO Nick Read explained
that while the plan to remove all government subsidy, except for rural
branches, by 2022 has been postponed, it was still intended to be achieved by
2025-6.
Read
outlined plans to introduce self-service kiosks in 2,000 to 3,000 branches
following the example of Post Canada. He admitted this would be at the expense
of jobs. Read also referred to a move into the pick-up and drop-off market and
for the Post Office to act as an outreach for banks that have deserted the high
streets in favour of online services. The Post Office has entered into
agreements with Amazon and DPD in relation to parcel deliveries, rather than
their exclusive handling by Royal Mail.
The sole
focus of the Post Office is to maximise profits as the government subsidy is
stripped out. This can only further undermine the social obligations it is
formally committed to in providing an accessible service to the elderly and
most vulnerable, and will be done at the expense of workers’ jobs, pay and
terms and conditions.
The Post
Office has been at the centre of a massive frame-up of postal workers through
the Horizon scandal. Hundreds of sub-postmasters and postmistresses were
wrongfully convicted to cover up the defective Horizon IT auditing system
designed and installed by Japanese company Fujitsu. This was introduced across
the Post Office network in 1999 at the cost of £1 billion. The defects in the
IT system showed false shortfalls in branch accounts and led to 736 unsafe
convictions for offences ranging from false accounting, theft and fraud between
2000 and 2014, resulting in some prison sentences.
This was
only brought to light due to the legal campaign by those wrongfully convicted
and their supporters, spanning a 20-year period against bitter resistance from
the Post Office. At the end of 2019 the Post Office finally agreed to pay
damages to 555 claimants in civil cases. Last April the Court of Appeal quashed
in a single ruling the convictions against 39 postmasters, part of a total of
72 such rulings to date, with many more expected to go to court. The bill of
compensation for the victims of injustice meted out by the Post Office is
estimated to be £1 billion.
One of
the “Post Office 39” who had their convictions overturned is Seema Misra, a
mother who was eight weeks pregnant with her second child when she was
sentenced in 2010 for theft and false accounting, spending four months in
prison, and ordered to pay £40,000 in compensation to the Post Office. Misra
stated, “The Post Office was like a mafia. They have blood on their hands. We
live in a developed country, how can we let these criminals roam around
freely?”
There is widespread anger among postal workers over the fact that nobody in authority at the Post Office or Fujitsu has faced criminal prosecution for what has been described as the most “widespread miscarriage of justice” in recent UK history. Both parties have been shown to have withheld evidence regarding the faulty IT system. Paula Vennells, who oversaw the cover-up and persecution of sub-postmasters, is estimated to have raked in £5 million in pay and bonuses during her time as managing director and later chief executive of the Post Office before stepping down in 2019.
Post Office
workers should reject the CWU’s argument that their fight should be conducted
separately from those in the public sector facing austerity. The claim that a
pay rise can be achieved by accepting the pro-business framework for the Post
Office of further restructuring to hike up profits is bogus.
We
encourage Post Office workers to read the Socialist Equality Party statement,
“The working class must mobilise to bring down the Johnson government.” This
outlines a strategy to mobilise the working class independently of the Labour
Party and trade unions, which act as accomplices of the government and the
employers as they demand increased exploitation and social looting in the
interests of the corporate and financial elite.
