The current political crisis in the U.S., marked by Trump's authoritarian cultural push, the Democratic Party's emphasis on racial narratives, and increasing attacks on democratic rights, must be viewed through a precise and analytical understanding of the American Revolution. The debate over "America’s story" extends beyond museum displays or school lessons; it is fundamentally a conflict over the historical roots of political awareness among the working class.
The ruling class recognises
history as a powerful tool. The distortion of the American Revolution—whether
via right-wing chauvinist myths or the racialist narratives of
identity-politics factions—is crucial for preserving capitalist dominance. To
counter these distortions, it is important to re-examine the American
Revolution using historical materialism, exposing its true nature as a
bourgeois-democratic rebellion with lingering contradictions that still
influence American society.
The Material Roots of Revolution
The American Revolution didn't
simply arise as a pure expression of “liberty.” Instead, it developed from the
concrete growth of capitalism in the Atlantic world during the eighteenth
century. By 1770, the colonies had grown into dynamic, expanding societies,
with their economic progress often conflicting with the limitations imposed by
British imperial authority.
A growing colonial
bourgeoisie—comprising merchants, planters, and land speculators—pushed for
unrestricted access to markets and land. Small farmers and artisans, burdened
with debt and facing imperial taxes, also fought in this movement. These class
interests, rather than ideals, drove the Revolution. As Marx noted about
bourgeois revolutions, they “storm heaven” only because material circumstances
force them to.
The Revolution was considered progressive for its era because it challenged monarchy and aristocratic privileges, paving the way for the growth of capitalism and the rise of the modern working class.
The Contradictions of a Bourgeois-Democratic Uprising
The Revolution’s claim that 'all
men are created equal' was genuine in its democratic rhetoric, reflecting a
bourgeois revolutionary ideal. However, the revolution was inherently
contradictory.
It maintained slavery, further dispossessed
Indigenous peoples, and limited political rights to propertied white men. These
contradictions weren't incidental; they stemmed from the class nature of the
revolutionary leaders, who sought to expand capitalism while preserving the
social structures that sustained their wealth.
The enslaved population clearly understood the risks. Tens of thousands escaped to British lines in pursuit of freedom. Indigenous nations acknowledged that independence would hasten settler expansion. While the Revolution promised liberty, it resulted in a republic where democratic rights were heavily restricted by class and race.
Constitution and the Consolidation of the Bourgeoisie
From 1783 to 1787, the
contradictions of the Revolution persisted. Shays’ Rebellion, driven by
indebted farmers, raised concerns among the propertied classes. The
Constitutional Convention was convened not to expand democracy but to limit it.
The resulting Constitution established a strong federal government designed to
safeguard private property, quell popular rebellions, maintain slavery, and
promote capitalist development.
The new republic was not a modern
democracy; instead, it was a bourgeois republic designed to keep political
power largely in the hands of the propertied classes.
Slavery, Capitalism, and the Road to Civil War
The Revolution did not resolve
the contradiction between slavery and capitalism. It intensified it. Slavery in
the American South was not a feudal relic but a highly profitable capitalist
system integrated into global markets. The Southern slave-owning class became a
reactionary force determined to expand slavery westward.
In the North, industrial
capitalism developed rapidly. The Northern bourgeoisie required free labour,
national markets, and federal policies favourable to industrial growth. The
conflict between these two ruling-class blocs—slave capital and industrial capital—became
irreconcilable.
The Civil War was the second
American Revolution. Under the pressure of events and mass struggle, the Union
was driven towards abolition. The destruction of slavery was a revolutionary
act, completing the unfinished tasks of 1776.
Reconstruction was betrayed when
the Northern bourgeoisie, having achieved its economic and political goals,
turned away from the freedmen. This led to the violent resurgence of planter
dominance, the emergence of Jim Crow laws, and the restriction of Black
political rights. Class interests, not moral failing, drove this betrayal.
The Crisis
of American Democracy
The political climate in the U.S.
has reached a point where the ruling elite openly challenges historical truth.
The Trump administration’s efforts—such as promoting “patriotic education,'
attacking museums and universities, and trying to enforce ideological
uniformity in public institutions—reflect the desperation of a capitalist
system facing a deep crisis. Meanwhile, the Democratic Party and its cultural
allies, heavily influenced by race and identity politics, have significantly
contributed to setting the stage for this confrontation.
The fight for historical truth is
fundamentally political, not just academic. It involves a struggle over
consciousness—whether the working class can grasp the true social forces
shaping their lives and respond. Falsifying history serves as a tool for
maintaining class dominance. To uphold democratic rights, oppose authoritarian
regimes, and develop a socialist movement, the working class must reclaim and
affirm the truth about its history.
History as a Battlefield of Class Interests
Every ruling class aims to shape
the historical narrative, especially during crises when control becomes urgent.
The American elite recognises that a populace educated in history—aware of
revolutions, struggles, and democratic ideals— threatens its dominance.
Consequently, the Trump administration has embarked on a campaign to “restore
patriotism” in American history. This effort isn't about factual accuracy but
about enforcing conformity. Its goal is to diminish critical thinking and
promote a mythology that elevates capitalism, downplays its crimes, and
presents the current social order as part of a divine national destiny.
The Democratic Party’s racialist
narrative, however, dismisses any progressive elements in American history. It
frames the American Revolution and Civil War solely as moments of white
supremacy, ignoring the democratic and revolutionary efforts that built the
nation. This perspective benefits a privileged upper-middle class that aims to
split workers by race and hide capitalism's core class conflicts. Both this and
alternative narratives distort the truth. Both support the interests of the
ruling class. Therefore, both should be rejected.
The Revolutionary Content of American History
The American Revolution was
neither a mythical battle of endless “freedomloving patriots” nor a conspiracy
rooted in white supremacy. It was a bourgeoisdemocratic revolution that
challenged monarchy and aristocratic privilege. At the same time, it had real
contradictions—particularly the preservation of slavery—; its progressive
aspects cannot be denied.
The Revolution claimed the
oppressor’s right to overthrow tyranny, establishing republicanism, expanding
political participation (for white men), and paving the way for capitalism and
the modern working class.
The Civil War is considered the
second American Revolution, dismantling the slave power, ending chattel
slavery, and briefly creating the chance for a multiracial democracy during
Reconstruction. The Northern bourgeoisie’s betrayal of Reconstruction was not
unavoidable but a deliberate class choice. After securing the interests of
industrial capital, they abandoned the freedmen and allowed the planter class
to reestablish its dominance.
These challenges are part of the
global effort for human emancipation and are associated with the working class,
not the oligarchy.
The Present Assault on Historical Consciousness
The Trump administration’s
cultural campaign is not just defensive but authoritarian, aiming to enforce a
specific patriotic narrative. This strategy seeks ideological uniformity, akin
to the concept of Gleichschaltung—the
alignment of cultural institutions with regime interests.
The Smithsonian, universities,
and cultural bodies are being targeted because they host exhibitions and
research on slavery, racism, labour movements, and social inequality. These
topics challenge the core beliefs of capitalist governance, promote critical
thinking, and expose societal contradictions.
The Democratic Party’s defence of
identity politics as “inclusive” and “representative' amounts to a bureaucratic
evasion. Rather than opposing authoritarianism, identity politics serves as a
distraction that divides the working class and conceals the true source of
oppression—the capitalist system.
The quest for historical truth
involves rejecting both the chauvinist mythology upheld by the right and the
racialist distortions propagated by the liberal establishment. The ruling class
fears history because it exposes several uncomfortable realities: that
democratic rights were won through struggle, that revolutions can happen, that
ordinary people have overthrown tyranny, that capitalism is not eternal, and
that the working class has agency.
A population aware of these
truths is a threat to the oligarchy, as it cannot be easily manipulated through
nationalism, racism, or authoritarian rhetoric. Such an informed populace
cannot be convinced that inequality is natural or that exploitation equates to
freedom.
This is why the ruling class aims
to erase or distort the revolutionary and democratic aspects of American
history. It also explains why the fight for historical truth is intrinsically
linked to the struggle for socialism.
The Working Class and the Revolutionary Legacy
The working class must reclaim
key elements of American history that are truly progressive: the revolutionary
assertion of the right to overthrow tyranny, the abolition of slavery, workers'
and immigrants' struggles against exploitation, and the democratic principles
found in the nation’s founding documents. These traditions belong to the
working class, not the oligarchy, and they point beyond capitalism toward a
socialist transformation of society. The fight for historical truth is
intertwined with the fight against authoritarianism, nationalism, and identity
politics. It also links to the broader goal of socialism. Like all major
bourgeois revolutions, the American Revolution created possibilities it could
not fully realise, and now, it is the working class's task to fulfil those
possibilities.