The American political system is showing signs of deep decay. The incident where Donald Trump circulated a post calling him “more dangerous than Hitler” is not just an isolated event but a reflection of the broader corruption affecting the entire capitalist system. The document emphasises that Trump’s authoritarian tendencies are fundamental, not accidental: as David North pointed out, Trump’s movement exhibits signs of fascism, with a distinct, troubling odour. Trump operates without regard for constitutional or legal constraints. These comments are serious assessments of a political trend that is emerging from the ongoing crisis of American capitalism.[1]
The Roman Circus on the South Lawn
Nothing highlights the brutality of the current
administration more clearly than the grotesque cage match on the White House
lawn—fighters fighting fiercely while Trump observed like a Roman emperor.
Marketed cynically as part of the “semiquincentennial” of the Declaration of
Independence, this event was a deliberate rejection of democratic values. It
celebrated violence, hierarchy, and dominance—precisely the social relations
the ruling class aims to enforce on the working class amidst preparations for
increased repression domestically and war. This isn't just Trump’s personal
issue. It exemplifies a broader political culture among the ruling class that has exhausted all democratic means of managing social conflict. The shift to
outright brutality indicates an oligarchy that can no longer govern through
consent.
The Liberal Establishment’s Counterfeit Anti‑Fascism
However, the primary political threat isn't just Trump’s
theatrics. It stems from how the Democratic Party and its media allies are
using the “Trump is worse than Hitler' narrative as a weapon. As the document
accurately notes, this portrayal “is not a genuine anti-fascist analysis.”
Instead, it’s a strategic ideological tactic aimed at directing widespread
opposition to Trump into the secure confines of a capitalist party that itself
undermines democratic rights.
The Democrats’ reaction to the White House spectacle—a $330
celebrity concert with Jane Fonda, Julia Roberts, and Bette Midler—exposes the
class basis of their politics. It exemplifies “the politics of affluent
identity, not the mobilisation of the working class.” This approach is
characterised by moral posturing, symbolic actions, and commodified dissent—in stark contrast to the mass, organised, internationalist
movement needed to oppose fascism.
The liberal media’s comparisons to Hitler serve two main
purposes. They first diminish the unique historical nature of fascism, turning
it into a moralistic stereotype instead of recognising it as a specific outcome
of capitalist crises. Second, these analogies turn the struggle against
authoritarianism into a branding strategy for the Democratic Party, which aims
to portray itself as the final defender of "democracy” even while backing
mass surveillance, militarism, and social suppression.
The Historical Lessons the Democrats Seek to Bury
Referring to Hitler's aims to obscure rather than clarify. The
text stresses that “Fascism was not halted by liberals or by voting for the
'lesser evil.' It was halted—where it was—by the organised force of the working
class, guided by a revolutionary Marxist plan." This crucial historical
fact is what the Democratic Party and its media outlets are eager to hide.
In Germany, the Social Democratic Party disarmed the working
class politically, clearing the way for Hitler’s rise. Similarly, in Italy, the
liberal bourgeoisie handed power to Mussolini to suppress the workers’
movement. In Spain, the Popular Front suppressed the revolution, allowing
Franco to win. In all these instances, the liberal bourgeoisie was unable to
oppose fascism because it feared the working class far more than it feared the
fascists.
The current situation remains similar. Democrats’ main goal
is not to combat authoritarianism but to stop the rise of a working-class
movement that could challenge capitalism itself.
The Real Target of the Hitler Comparisons: The Working
Class
Contemporary comparisons to Hitler are used to redirect
genuine anger towards backing the Democratic Party and NATO’s growing
militarism. The ruling elite aim to merge anti-Trump feelings with endorsement
of imperialist conflicts, portraying them as parts of a unified “defence of
democracy.” This is misleading. The working class has no stake in siding with
any segment of the capitalist oligarchy, whether under MAGA nationalism or
liberal humanitarianism.
“The working class must have its own party, program, and
independent struggle.” This is essential. Combating fascism is inherently
linked to opposing capitalism. It demands the formation of a revolutionary
socialist movement connected to the global working class, informed by
20th-century lessons, and unwavering in its resistance to all aspects of the
ruling elite.
Conclusion: The Path Forward
The threat of authoritarianism is real, but it cannot be
tackled solely through the Democratic Party, mainstream media, or superficial
liberal rituals. Instead, it requires a deliberate and organised global effort
by the working class to oppose the capitalist system, which fosters fascism,
war, and dictatorship. The goal is not to pick between different factions of
the oligarchy but to create a political force strong enough to overthrow the
oligarchic system entirely. This is the only way to achieve true democracy,
social equality, and human liberation.
[1] Donald
Trump proudly shares a post which says he is more dangerous than Hitler-www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/donald-trump-proudly-shares-post-37314895
